BESO charges its tenants a published $5 per billable call regardless of what the call billed. That is the incumbent's model. Here is how ours differs, line by line.
| SendAvata | BESO | |
|---|---|---|
| Platform fee | $5 / billable call, $0 setup, $0 per seat | $5 / billable call + $250 setup + $97/mo per agent (published) |
| Billing rule | $X / Ns per line; final at N seconds; under N free | Per-call, no duration gate on the platform fee |
| Presence | Carrier registration (WebRTC) | — |
| Tenancy | Postgres row-level security at the connection | — |
| Agent wallets | Prepaid, hosted checkout, tiers, negative-balance lock | Prepaid |
| Migration | Shadow mode, per-line cut-over | — |
| White-label | Domain, marks, colors, email, receipts | Yes |
| Setup fee | $0 | — |
Cells marked — are things BESO does not publish; we don't guess at competitors' internals. The BESO fee is from their public pricing at the time of writing. Verify both before you decide.
On a $17.50 social call, a flat $5 toll is 29% of revenue before anything else. On a $45 CTV call it's 11%. A percent-of-net model scales with what you actually billed; a flat desk removes the variable entirely. The calculator runs your own mix.
Both are white-label. Both let agents pre-fund. Both sit behind a ping tree. The differences are in the billing rule, the presence source, the isolation model, and how you get from one to the other.
Run SendAvata beside your current router, diff every routing decision, and cut over only when the ledgers match.
Every line reads $X / Ns. A connected call that reaches N seconds is billable and final; under N it's free. Disputes close in 72 hours.
Agency $179/mo + $5 per billable call. $0 setup, unlimited seats.
No demo, no sales call, no card. Create the workspace, drop your logo, paste one URL into your ring tree.